10/22/2026
โ๏ธ ๐๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ป๐๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ฏ๐ถ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ณ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐?
What happens when an employee is given only minutes to review an employment agreement printed in extremely small, blurry text?
The California Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in *Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc.* The employee was given approximately five minutes to review an onboarding packet containing a mandatory arbitration provision that was described as โnearly unreadable.โ
The Court held that while illegible formatting generally relates to **procedural unconscionability**, courts must take a closer look at the actual terms of an agreement when there is a high degree of procedural unfairness.
The decision also emphasizes that ambiguities in an agreement may be construed against the party that drafted it.
๐ Key factors employees may want to consider include:
โข How much time they were given to review the agreement
โข Whether the agreement was legible
โข Whether they had an opportunity to ask questions or negotiate
โข Whether they received a copy
โข Whether the terms are one-sided or unfair
Read the full article to learn more about *Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc.* and what the California Supreme Court's ruling could mean for employment arbitration agreements.
https://www.bamlawca.com/california-labor-laws/can-your-employer-force-you-into-arbitration-if-the-agreement-was-too-small-and-blurry-to-read-when-you-signed-it