31/07/2025
Recruiters versus A.I. Who wins?
Many people on LinkedIn are arguing that AI will evolve and take over recruiters’ jobs. They think we won’t be relevant anymore.
While we can understand this point of view, since A.I. can actually do what we do, but just the basic stuff (filter information, contact applicants), we know it can’t really cover the human factor:
❗ It can send a message, but it might not be able to respond to specific questions without a script.
AI is great for a big volume of information. Great at pattern recognition and spotting specific words on CVs or cover letters. But that’s all.
Emotional intelligence? Nope.
It can’t read between the lines, can’t pick up on tone of voice, or read body language during an interview. It can’t figure out the applicant’s motivation. And it’s not meant for nuance…
It also can’t understand if the applicant fits the team and the culture of a company. It can’t pick up on values, team dynamics or the “unspoken” expectations/rules of an employer. We feel them.
Relationship building? Unlikely. We have a pipeline of applicants, passive candidates and other people with whom we built a relationship. A.I. doesn’t have that.
Finally, people think that AI is great at eliminating biases. It’s impartial and doesn’t care about the vibes of an applicant, right? On the other hand, it can actually amplify some biases, based on the information you feed it.
If you instruct it to disqualify CVs that feature a certain word, you might miss out on some great applicants which use that word in a different way…
💣 So it’s even dangerous.
For the moment, the human “factor” in recruitment can’t be replaced.