31/07/2025
Recruiters versus A.I. Who wins?
Many people on LinkedIn are arguing that AI will evolve and take over recruitersâ jobs. They think we wonât be relevant anymore.
While we can understand this point of view, since A.I. can actually do what we do, but just the basic stuff (filter information, contact applicants), we know it canât really cover the human factor:
â It can send a message, but it might not be able to respond to specific questions without a script.
AI is great for a big volume of information. Great at pattern recognition and spotting specific words on CVs or cover letters. But thatâs all.
Emotional intelligence? Nope.
It canât read between the lines, canât pick up on tone of voice, or read body language during an interview. It canât figure out the applicantâs motivation. And itâs not meant for nuanceâŠ
It also canât understand if the applicant fits the team and the culture of a company. It canât pick up on values, team dynamics or the âunspokenâ expectations/rules of an employer. We feel them.
Relationship building? Unlikely. We have a pipeline of applicants, passive candidates and other people with whom we built a relationship. A.I. doesnât have that.
Finally, people think that AI is great at eliminating biases. Itâs impartial and doesnât care about the vibes of an applicant, right? On the other hand, it can actually amplify some biases, based on the information you feed it.
If you instruct it to disqualify CVs that feature a certain word, you might miss out on some great applicants which use that word in a different wayâŠ
đŁ So itâs even dangerous.
For the moment, the human âfactorâ in recruitment canât be replaced.