16/06/2025
๐ก You Did Everything Right. The Process Was Spotless. And the Hire Still Failed. Why?
A while ago, I worked with a fast-scaling tech company. They had just raised funding and the pressure was on. The roadmap was full, deadlines were tight, and their engineers were underwater. They told me they needed a mid level developer. Urgently.
The job description? A pile of buzzwords. They were looking for a โdynamic rockstar who thrives in a fast-paced environment.โ
The usual fluff.
When I asked what that actually meant, I got a few vague bullets:
โ
Build features โ
Take ownership โ
Handle pressure โ
Be proactive
When I pushed for more โ who this person would report to, what their first three months would look like โ the answers got even fuzzier.
But the team was tired. The pressure was real. So they moved forward with recruitment.
I found someone strong. Skilled. Curious. Calm. They had built similar systems before and asked smart, thoughtful questions.
The interviews went smoothly. No red flags. Everyone gave the green light. The person joined. Three months later, they were gone.
I asked what happened. The hiring manager said: โThey just were not what we expected.โ So I asked what exactly they expected.
That is when it surfaced:
๐ One person thought the new hire would take over a whole module
๐ Another assumed they would shadow someone for a while
๐ One expected them to rebuild the CI pipeline
๐ Another thought they would quietly fix bugs and avoid shaking things up
There had never been a real internal conversation about what this role truly required. Everyone had their own assumptions.
No one voiced them and the person walked straight into that confusion and did what many do: Tried to figure it out.
Tried to adapt.
Tried to read the room.
But when expectations are invisible and inconsistent
even the best talent cannot succeed.
Eventually, they quietly left.
And this happens more often than anyone wants to admit.
โ We think we are aligned because we are all in the same meeting
โ We think we are clear because the job description sounds confident
โ We think we are ready because the interviews are booked
โ We assume everyone sees the same urgency
โ We assume the scope is obvious
โ We assume someone else had the hard conversation
โ We assume the candidate will figure it out
โ And sometimes we assume that if they are truly good
they will just navigate the chaos on their own
But no one stops to ask the harder questions:
What exactly does this person need to achieve in month oneโ
Who will support them and howโ
What would make them want to leave within six monthsโ
Where might we unintentionally confuse or mislead themโ
From experience, hiring fails when these questions are skipped.
Not because the candidate was wrong.
Not because there is a lack of talent.
But because no one slowed down long enough to name what the job actually demands.
So you hire into a fog.
And by the time it clears
you have lost time
you have lost trust
and the person you hired is already gone.
โ
True story
โ
And I know I am not the only one who has seen it